[KARAH RUCKER] Wikipedia editors are debating whether Erika Kirk, wife of slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk, should have her own profile page. The page is currently locked until Sept. 18, preventing edits while editors weigh whether she meets the platform’s standards. The profile was created shortly after Charlie Kirk’s death, which thrust Erika into the […]
2 min.
[KARAH RUCKER]
Wikipedia editors are debating whether Erika Kirk, wife of slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk, should have her own profile page. The page is currently locked until Sept. 18, preventing edits while editors weigh whether she meets the platform’s standards.
The profile was created shortly after Charlie Kirk’s death, which thrust Erika into the national spotlight. Her speech Friday night, in which she vowed to continue her late husband’s work with Turning Point USA, was broadcast to millions and covered by major news outlets. Prior to the tragedy, Erika had not maintained a public profile beyond her 2012 Miss Arizona title and status as Kirk’s wife.
Many editors advocating for deletion argue that she does not meet Wikipedia’s general notability guidelines. They note in comments that significant coverage is limited, much of it focusing on her connection to her husband rather than her own accomplishments. Wikipedia policy emphasizes that subjects should not merit a page based solely on inherited notoriety, and coverage should be independent, substantial and from reliable sources.
Supporters of keeping the page counter that recent media attention makes her a relevant subject. They argue that Wikipedia frequently updates pages to reflect public interest and that her widely viewed speech, along with new profiles in major outlets, provide sufficient independent coverage to justify retaining the article.
Until a decision is made, Erika Kirk’s Wikipedia page will remain locked. While more editors are currently advocating for the page to stay, the decision will ultimately rest with administrators, who must determine whether current and independent coverage meets Wikipedia’s standards for notability.
This debate underscores a key point about Wikipedia: while it is widely used as a reference, it is a crowdsourced platform subject to ongoing editorial disputes. Journalists, scholars and academic institutions often do not consider it a definitive source, instead relying on independent, verified reporting.
Political Wikipedia entries can often become a source of contention. For instance, the site locked its entry for the term “recession” after an editing war broke out between those trying to edit into the page that the U.S. had officially entered into a recession in 2022, while the Biden administration had fought back against an economy getting designated as such. In July 2022, U.S. gross domestic product fell at an annualized rate of 0.9% during the second quarter of 2022, marking the second consecutive quarter to do so.
This, per Merriam Webster’s Dictionary, is the definition of a recession.
